UN Resolution: calling on governments to meet road safety targets

UN Resolution: calling on governments to meet road safety targets

Governments call on WHO and partners to support development of global road safety targets and request UN Secretary-General to explore establishment of a road safety trust fund. The UN General Assembly and its Member States adopted a resolution on “Improving global road safety”. The resolution, which was tabled by the Government of the Russian Federation, was co-sponsored by 55 governments.

UN General Assembly, New York, USA

Among key decisions, resolution A/70/L.44 reaffirms adoption of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets on road safety outlined in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development:

SDG targets :
3.6: which aims to reduce global road traffic deaths and injuries by 50% by 2020 and SDG target;

11.2: which aims to provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems for all by 2030.

The resolution acknowledges their importance and calls for action to reduce road traffic deaths and injuries as a pressing development priority. It also endorses the outcome document of the 2nd Global High-Level Conference on Road Safety, held in Brazil in November 2015, namely the “Brasilia Declaration on Road Safety“.

The resolution invites two major development conferences – the UN Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III, Quito, Ecuador, October 2016) and the 9th Global Conference on Health Promotion (Shanghai, China, November 2016) – to give appropriate consideration to road safety and sustainable mobility generally. It asks these to do so, while paying special attention to the needs of those in vulnerable situations, including people with disabilities.

Read more about the road safety crisis facing young people.
With regard to Member States, the resolution renews its call on governments to take a leading role in implementing the road safety-related SDG targets and the activities of the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020. In line with the Global Plan for the Decade of Action, and as documented in previous UN General Assembly resolutions, Member States are specifically invited to adopt comprehensive legislation on key risk factors, including speeding, drinking and driving, and failing to use motorcycle helmets, seat-belts and child restraints; improve the safety of vehicles and roads; and strengthen emergency trauma care for victims of road traffic crashes.
Lord Robertson of Port Ellen and Dr Etienne Krug of WHO take a #safie for the #SaveKidsLives campaign.
Member States are also requested to develop and implement targeted social marketing campaigns to raise awareness; commemorate the annual World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims; organize activities in 2017 to mark the Fourth UN Global Road Safety Week; support the activities of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Road Safety; and explore new and innovative funding modalities.
 
The resolution requests WHO, in collaboration with other UN agencies and UN regional commissions, to continue facilitating a transparent, sustainable and participatory process with all stakeholders to assist countries to develop voluntary global performance targets on key risk factors and service delivery mechanisms to reduce road traffic fatalities and injuries. WHO is also encouraged to continue to monitor, through its global status reports, progress towards the achievement of the goal of the Decade of Action.

YOURS Executive Director, Foor Lieshout, Administrator of the Global Alliance of Road Safety NGOs, Lotte Brondrum and Director of Violence Prevention, Injury, Disability and Non-Communicable Diseases; World Health Organization, Dr Etienne Krug take a #Safie.

Finally the resolution requests the UN Secretary-General to consider the possibility of establishing, from voluntary contributions, a Road Safety Trust Fund, to support the implementation of the Global Plan for the Decade of Action and road safety-related SDGs.
 
Road traffic deaths and injuries are a major health and development concern. WHO’s Global status report on road safety 2015 indicates that worldwide the total number of road traffic deaths has plateaued at 1.25 million per year, with the highest road traffic fatality rates in low-income countries. In the last three years, 17 countries have aligned at least one of their laws with best practice on the key risk factors noted above. While there has been progress towards improving road safety legislation and enhancing vehicle safety, the report shows that the pace of change is too slow. Urgent action is needed to achieve the ambitious targets reflected in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Brian’s Column: Drink Responsibly? What does that even mean?

Brian’s Column: Drink Responsibly? What does that even mean?

A group of Serbian students recently shared their campaign video with us on the trend of young using social media behind the wheel. In their efforts to raise awareness, the girls have created a campaign video focusing on “selfies” behind the wheel. Check it out here.

Students studying Traffic Engineering with a focus on road traffic safety, in their pre-exam period worked on a special road safety campaign project; shooting video and creating the preliminary design of posters.

The aim of the campaign is to point out how dangerous it is to use a mobile phone while driving, whether for communication and especially when taking photos a.k.a #selfies. Although the Law on Road Traffic Safety allowed the use of hands-free devices, it is not considered completely safe and recommended that the mobile phone is not used while driving.

So, anyways, that Wednesday evening while listening at my local radio station (Capital FM 91.3), the presenter said it: ‘…Drink Responsibly’. And that was the birthday of our hefty circumnavigating debate that one could write a PhD research proposal on what for goodness sake is ‘Drink Responsibly?’.

So, how bad is drink driving or drink walking?
The risk of a driver under the influence of alcohol being killed in a vehicle accident is at least eleven times that of drivers without alcohol in their system. Same goes if you were drunk walking. Oh yeah, I know we all say the froggy statistics but for the families and friends of those who die as a result of  drinking and driving, drinking and walking, each number represents an abyss suffered by fans of the ever loosing Arsenal & Manchester United! Cheers to that.

Wait, exactly how does getting drunk get my body into trouble?
Alcohol plays around with your perceptions and judgment reducing your reaction time most often taking many chances you would never take when sober. More often, you won’t be able to ascertain how far or close a vehicle or pedestrian is. While it’s true that alcohol is absorbed into the bloodstream via small blood vessels in the walls of the stomach and small intestine, the lovely liver does the hard job of breaking down the alcohol leaving the excess circulating throughout the body. This excess is what is measured by the police when they pull you aside, as Blood Alcohol Content (BAC). When the amount of alcohol in the blood exceeds a certain level, the respiratory (breathing) system slows down markedly, and may cause a coma or death, because oxygen no longer reaches the brain.

Is there a general human alcohol intake limit before getting drunk?
No…no way. You see the amount of alcohol you would need to drink to be drunk varies from person to person. Mainly, weight, gender (men tend to process alcohol faster than women), metabolism, type and amount you’re drinking, current stress levels, whether you’ve eaten recently, and age (younger people tend to process alcohol more slowly).

Read about Drink Driving in the Youth and Road Safety Action Kit here.

Yeah, but can I drink a little and drive or walk?
Even small amounts of alcohol can affect your ability to drive or walk so the only safe advice is to avoid any alcohol if you are driving or walking on the road with vehicles.

So, what’s this Blood Alcohol Concentration anyway?
This is exactly what the law enforcers will be looking for in your body. BAC limits can also be referred to as ‘drink driving limits’, ‘drunk driving limits’ or ‘drink drive limits’. It is a criminal offence to drive with a blood alcohol content that is above the legal limit.

The risk of involvement in a crash increases significantly above blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels of 0.04 g/dl. Less than half of countries worldwide (88 countries) have drink-driving laws based on a blood alcohol concentration limits that is equal to or less than 0.05 g/dl as recommended in the World report on road traffic injury prevention. In Africa, Algeria has the tightest BAC levels of 0.02 g/dl while Uganda has 0.08 g/dl. The thing is, the smaller the figure, the better. How is your country fairing? Read more.

Finally, what would drink responsibly mean?
Many people don’t realize that Road traffic injuries are the eighth leading cause of death globally, and the leading cause of death for young people aged 15–29. Read more.

Drink responsibly would at the very least mean no drinking at all. What y’all be thinking?

Follow Brian on Twitter

Welcome to our brand new website! Take a look around!

Welcome to our brand new website! Take a look around!

We have been working hard behind the scenes to get the new YOURS website up and running. We started YOURS back in 2009 building on from the 2007 United Nations World Youth Assembly for Road Safety. Back then, our website was cutting edge and remained so for many years, offering a fresh look at the world of road safety through the eyes of young people. Now in 2016, in our mission to remain on the cutting edge wavelength, we bring you a brand new website that once again revolutionizes how road safety is presented to the world. See our work, why we do what  we do and how we do it!

We extend a big warm welcome to you to our new website! We have reworked a lot of our information such as our work and our pillars and given a fresh look at the ways in which young people themselves can take action for road safety.

We believe in empowering young people and our new website makes accessing information regarding youth and road safety issues easier than ever. The style of the website reflects the design of the Youth and Road Safety Action Kit.

Explore our new website giving you the low down on:

  • Road Safety – get to grips with the latest information relating to young people and road safety.
  • Risk Factors –  explore the risk factors that put young people at most risk of death and injury on the road.
  • Our Work – explore what we do and how we do it, from campaigns, workshops to global advocacy.
  • News & Blog – read the latest opinion pieces and news stories from around the world.
  • Resources – explore the latest resources that we have on offer for you to download and use.
  • About Us – get to know our history, background, mission and values in a whole new way!

There is of course lots of information to explore so get your teeth sunk in and let us know what you think.

If you like the way we’ve presented our new site, let us on know on Twitter! Oh and if you come across a page that is not built yet, bear with us! Some pages are still being polished up! Enjoy!

GRSP – Mobilising Road Safety Action – Resource Centre

GRSP – Mobilising Road Safety Action – Resource Centre

The Global Road Safety Partnership (GRSP) have published a great tool for use in your own materials and road safety activities. The Advocacy Resource Centre provides tools and training to build targeted and innovative road safety advocacy campaigns. Explore the content gallery for case studies, images, facts, sample social media posts and so much more.

The following information offers a guide on how to use GRSP’s Advocacy Resource Centre. If you are looking for specific information, data or resources such as images, videos that you can readily use, this Resource Centre is perfect for your campaigns and beyond.

The content gallery provides raw materials and examples of all types of content needed to manage your communications campaign efforts.

The content gallery is organized via three types of filtering criteria:

These criteria can be mixed and matched to display the precise type of information you’re looking for (e.g. a search could be limited to ‘Videos’ and ‘Messaging’ that relate to ‘Speeding’)

The site also contains additional criteria that can be selected to further refine or search the content gallery:

Tactical Area: content that represents strategic ‘tactical buckets’

  • Building Public Awareness: content related to educating the public-at-large
  • Mobilizing Public Action: content focused on public action to influence a decision-maker or decision-making process
  • Engaging Key Opinion Leaders: engaging highly visible individuals who can build greater awareness or influence decision-makers
  • Engaging Traditional Media: content to engage journalists, editors and others at media houses, television and radio stations and newspapers
  • Engaging Decision-Makers: engaging government officials who have a direct role in advancing the advocacy objective

Risk Groups: content that specifically relates to a particular audience/affected population

  • Bicyclists: content relating to two-wheel, non-motorized transportation
  • Children: content relating to minors
  • Commercial & Occupational Drivers: content relating to professional drivers, including car services, taxi cab drivers, and delivery drivers, as well as any type of motor vehicle used for transporting goods or paid passengers
  • Elderly Drivers: content relating to the elderly
  • Novice Drivers: content relating to those new and learning how to operating a motor vehicle
  • Passengers: content relating to occupants in/on motorized vehicles
  • Pedestrians: content relating to the interaction and relationship between pedestrians and motorized vehicles
  • Powered 2 & 3 Wheel Wheelers: all content relating to motorcycles, scooters, bicycles, dirt bikes, and 3-wheelers

Additional Tags: content that is tagged with a particular attribute

  • Campaign: used for multiple pieces of content related to the same overall campaign/organization
  • City: specific content used in a specified metropolitan area
  • Content Use: content intended to be used in your own communications materials or to be informative of a best practice/creative idea
  • Country: content originated from a specific country
  • Featured: content that is particularly exemplary and/or performed very well
  • Media: content reflective of Paid Media or Earned Media activity
  • Phase: content pertaining to passing a new policy or implementing an existing policy
  • Region: content associated with a particular geographic region 

Visit the website now!

Sad or Mad? Stay Out of the Car! Emotional Driving

Sad or Mad? Stay Out of the Car! Emotional Driving

New research finds that driver-related factors such as fatigue, error, impairment and distraction – including getting behind the wheel while angry or sad – were present in nearly 90 percent of motor vehicle crashes. We’ve all heard “Don’t Drink and Drive.” But did you know that “Don’t Sad and Drive” might be nearly as important?

A new study from researchers at Virginia Tech Transportation Institute finds that drivers increase their crash risk nearly tenfold when they get behind the wheel while observably angry, sad, crying or emotionally agitated.

The Virginia Tech Transportation Institute researchers, writing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, also reported that drivers more than double their crash risk when they choose to engage in distracting activities that require them to take their eyes off the road, such as using a handheld cell phone, reading or writing, or using touchscreen menus on a vehicle instrument panel. And, according to the institute’s research, drivers engage in some type of distracting activity more than 50 percent of the time they are driving.

“These findings are important because we see a younger population of drivers, particularly teens, who are more prone to engaging in distracting activities while driving,” said Tom Dingus, lead author of the study and director of the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. “Our analysis shows that, if we take no steps in the near future to limit the number of distracting activities in a vehicle, those who represent the next generation of drivers will only continue to be at greater risk of a crash.”

Virginia Tech Transportation Institute researchers used results from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study, the largest light-vehicle naturalistic driving study ever conducted with more than 3,500 participants across six data collection sites in the United States.

The study represents the largest naturalistic crash database available to date, with more than 1,600 verified crash events ranging in severity from low, such as tire and curb strikes, to severe, including police-reportable crashes.

While previous naturalistic driving data analyses required combining crash data with “surrogate” crashes – or near-crashes and minor collisions – to determine driver risk, the magnitude of the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study facilitates the first crash-only analysis, resulting in the most conclusive findings to date of the biggest risks faced by drivers today, the researchers said.

Researchers Examined 905 Serious Crashes
For the current research, transportation institute researchers considered 905 higher severity crashes involving injury or property damage in the data set and found that, overall, driver-related factors that include fatigue, error, impairment and distraction were present in nearly 90 percent of the crashes.

“We have known for years that driver-related factors exist in a high percentage of crashes, but this is the first time we have been able to definitively determine – using high-severity, crash-only events that total more than 900 – the extent to which such factors do contribute to crashes,æ Dingus said.

Traveling well above the speed limit creates about 13 times the risk, and driver performance errors such as sudden or improper braking or being unfamiliar with a vehicle or roadway have an impact on individual risk.

Researchers found several factors previously thought to increase driver risk, including applying makeup or following a vehicle too closely, actually had a lower prevalence in the naturalistic driving study, meaning they were minimally present or were not present at all in the crashes analyzed.

Factors such as interacting with a child in the rear seat of a vehicle were found to have a protective effect, or had a risk lower than the base risk value.

“All of these findings are especially important as we work with policymakers, educators, drivers themselves, law enforcement officials and vehicle designers to define and help mitigate driver risks,” Dingus said. “Our ultimate goal is to identify those risks and to help others create the necessary countermeasures to ensure the safety of ground transportation users.”

Road rage can be a real contributor to dangerous driving, reports show.

All factors analyzed in the article were compared to episodes of model driving, or episodes in which the drivers were verified to be alert, attentive and sober, marking the first known time such a comparative analysis has been made.

Real-World Driver Performance Data Collected

The naturalistic driving study method pioneered at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute involves equipping volunteer participants’ vehicles with unobtrusive instrumentation – including a suite of cameras, sensors, and radar – that continuously collects real-world driver performance and behavior, from the time the drivers turn on the ignition to the time they turn off their vehicles.

Drivers in the Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study participated between one and two years each, resulting in more than 35 million miles of continuous naturalistic driving data that are securely housed in a data warehouse located on-site at the transportation institute.

The Second Strategic Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study is one of the largest projects funded by the National Academy of Sciences, with more than $50 million awarded to the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute alone, which led the study with several partners. The institute was recently awarded a contract with the National Academies to support users who wish to access data from the naturalistic driving study, including researchers, government agencies and auto manufacturers and suppliers.

A view on road safety in India: much to do – Opinion Piece

A view on road safety in India: much to do – Opinion Piece

Road safety is a critical issue in India. The number of vehicles on its roads is rising, urban centres are congested, and motorway networks are expanding. However, the rules and regulations governing road safety date back to the Motor Vehicle Act 1988 (MVA), which is outdated and poorly enforced.

Then there is a general lack of awareness of basic traffic rules, absence of traffic signage and lights, and dangerous road conditions. Finally, neither passenger nor commercial vehicles come equipped with basic safety features. It is common to drive without a license or seat belt. The general public are reluctant to help accident victims for fear of getting caught up in court battles, whilst medical help is often too little too late. So, unlike other developing countries such as Brazil and Russia, the number of people dying on the roads of India shows no sign of falling.

Unlike other developing countries such as Brazil and Russia, the number of people dying on the roads of India shows no sign of falling.

There is no shortage of government ministers, activists and non-government organisations (NGOs) trying to address this problem. Take, for example, Nitin Gadkari, Minister of Road Transport and Highways; Vijay Chhibber, Secretary for the Department of Road Transport and Highways (RTH); and Prince Singhal, a road safety expert and an advisor to the Ministry of RTH. Then there are non-profit organisations, such as the SaveLIFE Foundation, and initiatives by motor companies such as Hyundai Motors’ Safe Move -Traffic Safety Campaign. The latter hopes to increase acceptance and recognition by drawing in celebrity sponsors such as Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan.

Bollywood superstar, Shah Rukh Khan joins action for road safety in India.

Community programmes aim to build ‘road safety as a mass movement’ especially amongst the youth who tend to suffer disproportionately in accidents. According to Prince Singhal, these programmes are necessary to help strengthen the core goals of India’s road safety programme or the “Four Es” of road safety — Education, Engineering, Enforcement and Environment.

However, initiatives undertaken in the past five years have been unsuccessful according to the International Road Federation (IRF). Statistics from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) show that 1.2 million people died in road accidents between 2004 and 2014. In 2014 alone there were 140,000 road traffic deaths, 17,000 of which were children. However, the Global Status Report on Road Safety (GSR) 2015 published by the World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that the actual figure is 46% higher — 200,000 deaths annually. A lack of “legislative and executive interventions” is largely to blame.

With a strong culture in India, is road safety embedded in that?

Initiatives undertaken in the past five years have been unsuccessful according to the International Road Federation (IRF).

Piyush Tewari, chief executive (and founder) of the SaveLIFE Foundation, says, “the report should be an eye-opener for our law makers, as it categorically states that Indian road safety laws do not meet the best practice requirements for four of five risk factors — enforcing speed limits, prevention of drunk driving, safety of children and use of helmets. Even for seat belts, where the MVA is in line with WHO standards, enforcement is poor and India has a score of four out of 10.” India meets only two out of seven basic minimum standards for vehicle manufacturing.

Government ministers insist India is committed to “improving safety, efficiency and sustainability in the transport sector.” According to Mr Gadkari, India is working with the IRF, the WHO and the World Bank to strengthen regulatory institutions, design and engineer safer roads, and improve emergency response and medical care systems. It is working to increase awareness of road safety, the importance of obeying traffic rules and driving safely. The government has endorsed the United Nations’ Safe System Approach, and is introducing road safety as part of school curriculum. More significantly, the minister is pressing the government to replace the MVA with a more comprehensive law to promote road safety and the development of “efficient, seamless and integrated multi-mode public transport system.”

Despite his best efforts, there has not been much progress. Former transport secretary S Sundar, led the Ministry of RTH in drafting a “comprehensive road safety law”, which is still awaiting approval by Parliament. Possible reasons include resistance and lobbying by local governments, manufacturers, regulatory authorities who have much to lose from an efficient, transparent, properly enforced regulatory system. Mr Gadkari has promised to reintroduce the bill in winter 2015.

Policy changes are all very well… but enforcement is key along with good education.

Good Samaritans, meanwhile, are mostly unaware that the Ministry of RTH has issued guidelines (2015) for their protection, so there is a significant number of accident victims that are dying preventable deaths for lack of roadside first aid. Dr Mahesh Joshi, co-chairman of Emergency Medicine in India, says 50% of traffic fatalities are preventable but for the lack of emergency medical aid, and strongly recommends setting up an “emergency medical response system”. Similarly, Ravishankar Rajaraman, of JP Research India, recommends a comprehensive database of traffic accidents to be used to develop targeted safety programmes. Traffic police need better road infrastructure and technology to police speeding and drunk driving — two primary causes of road accidents — and enforce penalties. Enforcement is a huge problem. Policy changes are all very well, according to The Spinal Foundation’s Komal Kamra, but enforcement is key.

Life changing injuries and deaths affect India dearly in terms of health care and economic costs. The government’s planning commission estimates the annual economic loss of road deaths at 3% of GDP — ₹3,800 billion or US$56 billion (2014). These costs are borne disproportionately by the “poor and vulnerable… pedestrians, cyclists, drivers of two- and / or three-wheel motor vehicles and passengers of unsafe public transportation.”

India’s road network is the second longest in the world and its transport sector key to its economic growth. The government plans to continue building at the rate of 30km of highway daily. Without significant improvements in traffic infrastructure and road safety, the current average of one death per each 2km of national highway can only rise.